In this video, we evaluate a publisher's site for approval. Unfortunately, this particular publisher was rejected due to low-quality content. There are a few reasons for this.

Firstly, all articles on the home page of the site are dated April 13, 2024, which happens to be today's date. This is suspicious because it is highly unlikely that this site could have produced so many articles in such a short amount of time without the help of AI or without producing duplicate content.

Secondly, when looking at one of the articles on the home page between the 17-19-second mark of the video, we noticed that instead of an article excerpt, there was some kind of code. This issue was also present when viewing the article between 0:45-1:09 in the video. The page was also too wide, and the right rail covered the content, making it difficult to read.

These issues with the site's content and display were enough to get it rejected. While we have nothing against the use of AI, we are looking for sites that produce quality, unique content. Sites that provide articles that other sites have already published are acceptable, as multiple news channels may report on the same event. However, it's important to provide unique value to the reader. Technical issues with how the content is displayed are also a reason for rejection.